Project context
Site location, project type, current stage, intended use and the decision or outcome needed.
Review available drawings and site information to understand how the roof and supporting structure may respond to additional solar dead, maintenance and wind loads.
Existing buildings vary in original design, condition and available records. The assessment should account for what is known about the roof, its supporting system, proposed mounting and anchorage, and the limitations of the information available.
The first review should establish what information is available, what assumptions are proposed and which decisions the work must support. Any limitations that affect the conclusions should be recorded before the deliverable is used by the wider team.
The required information changes by service. These are useful starting points; the final input list should match the actual project.
Site location, project type, current stage, intended use and the decision or outcome needed.
Available drawings, loading criteria, equipment data, surveys or geotechnical information where relevant.
Agreed deliverables, assumptions, exclusions, review responsibilities, revisions and timing.
Some assignments need coordination across more than one workstream. Any combined scope should be agreed before work begins.
Structural engineering support for module mounting structures, including load paths, member checks, stability, connections and deflection review based on project-specific criteria.
Explore service ↗Coordinate foundation design with structural reactions and project-specific geotechnical information. The final solution should reflect actual ground conditions and installation constraints.
Explore service ↗Early-stage structural and site coordination to identify constraints before detailed design, procurement and installation decisions are locked.
Explore service ↗Practical answers about the inputs, limitations and deliverables that matter for this kind of work.
Existing structural or architectural drawings, roof type, building age if known, available condition photographs, solar layout and module/mounting details are useful. Site inspection or measurement may be needed if records do not reflect the actual building.
Photographs can help identify visible concerns, but usually cannot establish the capacity of the entire load path. The review method should reflect the quality of records, condition information and project-specific requirements.
The assessment should consider the proposed system's permanent weight, relevant maintenance loads, wind effects and any other equipment loads applicable to the project. The design basis must be agreed for the actual installation.
That is common in existing buildings, but it creates uncertainty. Available records, measured dimensions, inspection findings and any necessary testing should be reviewed to decide what conclusions can reasonably be made.
Share the site, the project stage and the information already available.